Santorum. Iowa. Really?????

Jordan's picture

I'll pay attention if Ron Paul wins some stuff. Other than that, meh. Who cares.

A. Jordan Rushie
215.268.3978

www.rushielaw.com

stein's picture

in '08 huckabee won the republian caucus in iowa. i'm not saying that all iowans are evangelicals, but they certainly have a fair bit of sway within the republican party. between that and him getting lucky and being 'discovered' by the anti-romney wing of the republican base at just the right time for the caucus to happen before a superPAC could start battering him with negative ads the timing was perfect. Yet he still came in second.

we are looking at peak santorum right now, in my opinion. he won't do very well in new hampshire or south carolina and by the time they are done the voters will be disillusioned with him anyways.

more interesting to me is that paul was such a close third and that no candidate got more than 24.6% of the vote.

Ken Milano (before he went and edited this comment out to avoid the consequences of having wrote it) wrote:
I don’t have much sympathy for renters, for me, they are non citizens

bonzombiekitty's picture

He was just next in line for the "not Romney" train for conservatives. The Santorum campaign was banking on his turn coming up right around caucus time.

stein's picture

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/01/04/rickrolled_three_lessons_from_iowa.html

Quote:
Lesson Three: Republicans aren't so excited about 2012. Four years ago, a depressed GOP went to the precinct caucuses, very well aware that Democrats had all the energy. The total GOP vote: 119,188. This year, Republicans should be psyched about the chance to uproot Barack Obama. There will be something above 122,000 total votes. An improvement, right? Well... in 2008, 86 percent of the people who chose the GOP caucuses were Republicans. This year, 75 percent of the electorate was Republican, with the rest of the vote coming from independents and Democrats. What the hell happened?

its looking more and more like bizarro 2004 out there.

Ken Milano (before he went and edited this comment out to avoid the consequences of having wrote it) wrote:
I don’t have much sympathy for renters, for me, they are non citizens

codergrrl's picture

Won't alot of people, including Perry, be pulling out after that showing? Before they get to New Hampshire?

"Je Suis Prest"

stein's picture

I dont believe that anyone who has heard perry speak can possibly back him.

"oops"

Ken Milano (before he went and edited this comment out to avoid the consequences of having wrote it) wrote:
I don’t have much sympathy for renters, for me, they are non citizens

stein's picture

to be fair, that means nothing to them

Ken Milano (before he went and edited this comment out to avoid the consequences of having wrote it) wrote:
I don’t have much sympathy for renters, for me, they are non citizens

JedicusMaximus's picture

I agree with Stein that almost immediately after jumping in the race it was obvious that Perry was going to struggle to be taken seriously, but at this point Perry is certainly out of the race. After finishing in an even worse position than recent polls he is now going to back to Texas to "evaluate" his canidacy.

10011101

snailgem's picture

santorum the crusader flying the holy fetus on his banner is coming to slaughter anti-christian un-american gay-loving voters with degrees from liberal univesities; with his sword he will cut the hands of contraceptive-using infidels and any head that harbors abortion thoughts will roll.

codergrrl's picture

I guess I'm screwed.

"Je Suis Prest"

steveeboy's picture

I never, EVER, want to be looking at "peak Santorum"!!!

snailgem's picture

Kenzo wrote:
I think Santorum is only in this to clear up his Google Search reputation:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_%22santorum%22_neologism

oh, but there is so much more to clear:

-When I asked him if he viewed gay marriage as a threat to his own marriage, he answered quickly. ''Yes, absolutely,'' he said.

-He says that his faith taught him never to equate poverty or lack of achievement with character, so it is a given, to Santorum, that some people will always need help. ''We always did things for the poor,'' he said. ''I remember my dad always saying, 'If you have extra money, put it in the poor box at the back of the church.' ''

-Earlier this year, Santorum voted against a Democratic amendment to a bankruptcy bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $7.25...

-He said he did not see the difference between a Bible and ''the teachings of Aristotle -- that's a philosophy of life.'' He added: ''Here you have a book that's been pretty well tested over time. So to say, here are some passages from the Bible that may help you, I don't necessarily see that as a negative.''

-Santorum is not a reader of Scripture -- ''I've never read the Bible cover to cover; maybe I should have'' -- and has no passages he clings to when seeking spiritual guidance.

-Rick and Karen Santorum would not let the morgue take the corpse of their newborn; they slept that night in the hospital with their lifeless baby between them. The next day, they took him home. ''Your siblings could not have been more excited about you!'' Karen writes in the book, which takes the form of letters to Gabriel, mostly while he is in utero. ''Elizabeth and Johnny held you with so much love and tenderness. Elizabeth proudly announced to everyone as she cuddled you, 'This is my baby brother, Gabriel; he is an angel.' ''

-Bob Kerrey, the former senator from Nebraska ...says now: ''I've come to believe that he is sincerely and impressively a man of faith. He is driven by his personal desire to do good. But at some point, money matters. We're not even close to spending enough to solve social problems. I don't know what he can do with his own party, but maybe he'll shame the liberals into doing more.''

http://tinyurl.com/3s8nq7v

dan

Blah. The religious right (and particularly today's Christian right) continues to cause me great consternation.

While I understand (and support!) the choice to live by what our society has decided to label "socially conservative values", I would think that folks would be able to look at both religious and secular sources and be able to see that forcing folks to live by those values, rather than inviting them to choose to live by those values, just doesn't work.

Plus, the self-righteous anger against assisting the poor and working towards social justice runs contrary to everything from Jesus's teachings to the great prophetic traditions of the Hebrew scriptures.

Bleh.

This is not a signature.

stein's picture

Iowa wasn't chosen to go first, it just kind of lucked into it and then once it realized its advantage it protected it ruthlessly.

Ken Milano (before he went and edited this comment out to avoid the consequences of having wrote it) wrote:
I don’t have much sympathy for renters, for me, they are non citizens

dan

I wish the religious right had such a noble beginning as Roe v. Wade.

The reality is that the religious right had its start in fighting government efforts to end racist policies at a small number of religious-based private schools. Abortion became the issue later through a combination of factors including everything from the writings of Francis Schaeffer to the desire of some folks simply to find an issue that would let them continue to hold political power.

Also, while the largest percentage of white Evangelicals have become political conservatives within the GOP ranks, there is a wide ethnic and political diversity to Evangelicals (particularly younger ones) that is often missed. While rules-of-thumb (that sounds nicer than "stereotypes" or even "generalizations") can be helpful, it does us no more good to look at Evangelicals as a monolith than it does to look at Muslims or Latinos or the LGBTQQ community or Democrats or Pennsylvanians as one.

one more postscript: I'd rather people look past their pastor/priest/rabbi/imam/etc. to find the source of the moral guidance.

Hope that didn't sound argumentative. I actually agree with most of what you (Kenzo) said. I just want to take the conversation yet another step deeper.

This is not a signature.

dan

To be perfectly clear, I'm not a Santorum supporter. That said, I have never seen any evidence that he would try to outlaw or even restrict access to contraception. I am, of course, open to anything that shows otherwise.

I'm not surprised that he's opposed to it, or that he speaks out against it. People seem to have forgotten that he is Catholic. I can't believe the number of folks who think he's an Evangelical Protestant. (a symptom of the confusion of theology and politics happening in both churches and secular society) [There are, of course, some Evangelicals who also oppose contraception - the most famous example being the Duggars - but they are a tiny percentage.]

This is not a signature.

dan

and why, oh why, can't Republicans PLEASE take another look at Huntsman? Please!!!

This is not a signature.

th's picture

dan wrote:
[There are, of course, some Evangelicals who also oppose contraception - the most famous example being the Duggars - but they are a tiny percentage.]

They seem to be working hard to change that - one baby at a time.

You wanna dance? LET'S DANCE!

george's picture

dan wrote:
and why, oh why, can't Republicans PLEASE take another look at Huntsman? Please!!!

He commited the unpardonable sin of working for the Marxist/Jihadist/Kenyan Obama. That's a deal breaker right there for a large chunk of the GOP.

Plus, Huntsman is bright and even sensible at times. Two more big strikes.

snailgem's picture

dan wrote:
...I have never seen any evidence that he would try to outlaw or even restrict access to contraception. I am, of course, open to anything that shows otherwise.

i think his denunciation of griswold vs ct and similar cases shows that he would indeed support if not propose such legislation if he agreed with its language.

snailgem's picture

dan wrote:
and why, oh why, can't Republicans PLEASE take another look at Huntsman? Please!!!

he's not for now. the poison has not yet run its full course in the gop bloodstream. if he doesn't become a victim to it himself, this presidential run might give him some cred to be a reforming figure in the future.

dan

snailgem wrote:
dan wrote:
...I have never seen any evidence that he would try to outlaw or even restrict access to contraception. I am, of course, open to anything that shows otherwise.

i think his denunciation of griswold vs ct and similar cases shows that he would indeed support if not propose such legislation if he agreed with its language.

Opposition to Griswold is fairly standard among pro-lifers (at least those who know enough to be making reference to Supreme Court precedent) because it helps underpin Roe v. Wade. However, there is not unanimity among pro-lifers over contraception, and it's probably true that the majority of pro-lifers are okay with contraception. Still not convinced anti-contraception is part of Santorum's political agenda, but willing to hear more.

This is not a signature.

snailgem's picture

dan wrote:
snailgem wrote:
dan wrote:
...I have never seen any evidence that he would try to outlaw or even restrict access to contraception. I am, of course, open to anything that shows otherwise.

i think his denunciation of griswold vs ct and similar cases shows that he would indeed support if not propose such legislation if he agreed with its language.

Opposition to Griswold is fairly standard among pro-lifers (at least those who know enough to be making reference to Supreme Court precedent) because it helps underpin Roe v. Wade. However, there is not unanimity among pro-lifers over contraception, and it's probably true that the majority of pro-lifers are okay with contraception. Still not convinced anti-contraception is part of Santorum's political agenda, but willing to hear more.

indeed, and if you told me that another pro-lifer wants to ban contraception i would have more doubts about it. but santorum's record and narrow focus on these issues in his legislative life seems to me like that of someone who is willing to take the extra step from banning abortions to banning contraceptives:

http://www.ricksantorum.com/executive-branch-actions

(and check out the last item, re your point about people thinking he's an evangelical)

stein's picture

george wrote:
dan wrote:
and why, oh why, can't Republicans PLEASE take another look at Huntsman? Please!!!

He commited the unpardonable sin of working for the Marxist/Jihadist/Kenyan Obama. That's a deal breaker right there for a large chunk of the GOP.

Plus, Huntsman is bright and even sensible at times. Two more big strikes.

Dont forget he dropped out of high school to be in a band and likes captain beefheart.

Ken Milano (before he went and edited this comment out to avoid the consequences of having wrote it) wrote:
I don’t have much sympathy for renters, for me, they are non citizens